Wednesday, February 26, 2014

The Endangered List (Case File #139) -- Found!


Four prints under the HOT AND BOTHERED title were located in 2012 and are now part of the American Genre Film Archive (AGFA)


CUGINI CARNALI (1974)

A Carlo Ponti production

Starring
Susan Player
Hugh Griffith
Riccardo Cucciolla
Alfredo Pea
Claudio Nicastro
Rosalba Neri
Fiorella Masselli
Renzo Marignano
Lia Tanzi
Ennio Colaianni
Ralf Baldassarre

Directed by
Sergio Martino

Produced by
Carlo Ponti

Written by
Sergio Martino
Fernando Popoli
Sauro Scavolini

Cinematography by
Giancarlo Ferrando

Music by
Claudio Mattone

in Eastmancolor & Technicscope
Released by Independent-International Pictures
as LOVING COUSINS (1976)
Re-released as HIGH SCHOOL GIRL
and HOT AND BOTHERED

87 minutes
MPAA rating: R


ABOUT THE PRODUCTION

LOVING COUSINS is a wonderful film from producer Carlo Ponti that combines the successful elements of both SUMMER OF ’42 with LOLITA – and goes them each one better. In this story of young love and sexual awakening, Ponti has chosen a new young star, Susan Player for the leading role and with good reason. Miss Player IS the entire film and Ponti’s choice was a wise one. This new actress from England is already being hailed by many of the world’s important film producers and she is now working for Warner Brothers as the star of THE ADOLESCENTS. Co-starring with Susan Player is Academy Award winner Hugh Griffith, who got his Oscar for his great role in BEN-HUR. Griffith plays the rich, lecherous old uncle who advises his young niece to go after her 18 year old cousin, who has not been initiated into manhood.


SYNOPSIS

16 year old Sonia is blonde, trim of figure and a young emancipated girl. She doesn’t believe in wearing bras, she sunbathes in the nude and if the time is right and the boy is right…she loves to love.

Sonia is spending her summer vacation with relatives. Her uncle is a wealthy professor who acts very conservative and prudish about everything. In reality he is carrying on with various of the household maids and even making arrangements to set up liaisons with the housekeepers’ young teenage daughters. On the side, his most religious wife is keeping up a longtime affair with a local religious leader in the community.

Nico, the professor’s 18 year old son, is treated like a 10 year old. He is given short pants to wear and long hours to study. His studies have led him to pornographic stories which he has discovered in Latin – and reads secretly. Nico keeps up an air of great stuffiness around Sonia, but she knows that he is secretly spying on her when she is sunbathing and dressing, etc. At the urging of the lecherous old Baron, who lives in a mansion surrounded by whores who attend to him, Sonia decides to go after Nico.

Nico gets flustered at this attention and pushes Sonia off on a muscular friend who approaches all girls like an animal in heat. Sonia doesn’t like this approach, and the though of seducing Nico into his first intimacy just tickles her fancy.

Sonia sends a false telegram to Nico’s parents explaining that the old Baron is dying and they are to come at once. This requires a long car trip and leaves Nico alone in the house with Sonia.

Sonia sets up a seduction scene for Nico with delicacy and charm. She wears an old corset and long black stocking she found in the attic. When she gets Nico to come to her…she bids him to undress her and tenderly initiates him into the art of love.

The next morning Nico is sleeping and a taxi arrives at the house. Sonia takes her bags and drives off quietly – the summer is over...


BOXOFFICE review

It's said that cousins usually initiate each other into the art of making love and that premise serves as the basis for this film's Sergio Martino-Sauro Scavolini-Fernando Popoli script. The Carlo Ponti production, directed by Martino, has been give a sumptuous production look and it is definitely in the class of Independent-International's better attractions. Lots of nudity, mostly on the feminine side, and the presence of a fresh young face in Susan Player give the film further value. Ms. Player, who has never acted before, is remarkably poised as a free-spirited young lady who determines to introduce her repressed cousin, Alfredo Pea, to sex. Riccardo Cucciolla is Pea's domineering and lecherous father and Hugh Griffith wins laughs as the even more lecherous but lovable uncle who refuses to die and leave his inheritance. The English dubbing is generally fair, with Griffith's unmistakable voice coming through clearly. In Eastman Color and Techniscope and with a relatively short running time, "Loving Cousins" can easily top a bill or go as a single. Audiences will want to see more of Susan Player (not that she has anything more to show) and should be happy to learn that she has another film or two forthcoming.

(Boxoffice, November 8, 1976, p. 4905)


"Interminable Italian Seduction Even Fails at Soft-Core"
by Richard Eder

LOVING COUSINS is a dull, unwholesome Italian film that aims at being soft-core, but is only soft. It has as much erotic energy as two slugs coupling. It tells of the interminably slow seduction of an inhibited boy -- he looks like Pinocchio -- by his liberated girl-cousin. The hot weather is emphasized. The camera takes close-ups of mouths untidily eating fruit and salad, and of bare legs crossing. The film, which opened yesterday at the Trans-Lux 86th Street and other theatres, is opaque and blotchy. It looks as if it had been knitted.

(New York Times, November 11, 1976, p. 53)


Variety review

This Italo import, one of the many films of the prolific Sergio Martino, probably was released as a programmer in its own country, but will be harder to sell here unless emphasis is placed on its treatment of Italian morals. The only innocent in the entire film is Nico, the 18-year-old son of a provincial landowner.

Literally, everyone else sleeps around – the manor owner with most of the female servants, the wife with the village priest, the lecherous baron-uncle of the family, played with a drool by Hugh Griffith, who’d mate with anyone if he weren’t bedridden from his earlier excesses.

A cousin, blonde and beautiful but rather stupid, is sent to spend the summer and maybe pick up some education from her smart (in book learning) male cousin. It figures that she becomes the teacher but it takes the entire film to get her bashful relative into bed.

Handsomely photographed with some lovely provincial Italian scenery, it’s a pleasant but slow-paced comedy with most of its appeal to the voyeurs who like to look at almost-dressed young females (and Susan Player is, admittedly, a dish). – Robe.

(Reviewed at the 5th Avenue Screening Room, N.Y., April 5th, 1976 and published in Variety on April 14, 1976)


‘Hot and Bothered’ for Naught
by Donna Chernin

Looking over the poor choice of movies that sneaked into town over the weekend without advance notice, I figured that I would rather be “Hot and Bothered” than “Dead and Buried.”

Poor Nico, the 16-year-old central character of this inept Italian farce, would like to be hot and bothered too, but all Nico can seem to do is gawk at his blonde, bored-looking cousin Sonia, who has ostensibly come to live with them for some tutoring.

It soon becomes clear that Sonia would much rather be in the bedroom than the library. She rubs ice cubes on her cleavage, and, wearing a miniskirt, rides her bike through the dusty streets and wanders into church.

From Nico’s viewpoint, everyone is sexually active but him in “Hot and Bothered.”

Nico’s tyrannical father is sleeping with the maid, and it seems likely that Nico’s mother had been enterprising with the parish priest.

A lascivious baron, Nico’s godfather, croaks that, “The boy needs a girl, and so do I.” Meanwhile, Nico’s best friend lusts after Sonia, which makes our Nico fret and fume all the more.


If you think a good deal of panting and passion fills the screen, you are wrong. Until the scene where Sonia finally snares her prey, there is scant sex.

The symbolism is blatant, the dubbing terrible and the print scratchy.

The only amusing line occurs when Nico’s father asks Sonia, “Don’t you ever wear a bra?” She retorts, “When you have healthy legs, you don’t walk on crutches.”

While Sonia is no beauty queen, she is a far sight sharper than the gangling Nico. I kept wondering why Sonia so persistently wanted to lure Nico into bed. In any event, I just wanted them to get on with it already so that this dull and unerotic farce could end.

It is questionable how much faith the people connected with “Hot and Bothered” had with the picture. The credits are nowhere to be found. Who plays what? Who directs? Who cares? Not the manufacturers of the movie, certainly.

(Cleveland Plain Dealer, September 22, 1981, p. 4D)

Sunday, February 23, 2014

Movie Ad of the Week: RETURN OF THE CHINESE BOXER (1983)



THE CHINESE BOXER (1969), a trendsetting and immensely popular Hong Kong martial arts film, was Jimmy Wang Yu's directorial debut as well as his final appearance in a Shaw Brothers production (It was released in the U.S. by Enchanted Filmarts in 1973 as THE HAMMER OF GOD). The sort-of sequel RETURN OF THE CHINESE BOXER, shot in Taiwan in 1974 and also directed by and starring Yu Wang, was nearly 10 years old when William Mishkin Motion Pictures subdistributed it in the New York area for Unifilm International. Opening date: February 25, 1983.

Wednesday, February 12, 2014

THE EXQUISITE CADAVER (1969)



Nope, it's not here! Head over to Theater of Guts for Temple of Schlock's look at THE EXQUISITE CADAVER!

Sunday, February 09, 2014

Movie Ad of the Week: FIVE ANGRY WOMEN w/ THE ALIEN FACTOR (1984)



This double bill of "top new films" opened in New York on April 13, 1984 and -- according to the Gore Gazette -- closed the next morning! The first feature was shot in April 1973 under the titles RUN, BABEE, RUN and FIVE FEMALE FUGITIVES and had been in theatrical release from Mardi Rustam as FIVE ANGRY WOMEN for at least seven years prior to this. It would soon show up on video shelves as WOMEN UNCHAINED (Video Gems) and ESCAPE FROM CELL BLOCK 3 (Prism Entertainment). The second feature, Cinemagic magazine founder Don Dohler's THE ALIEN FACTOR, carries an onscreen copyright date of 1977.

Sunday, February 02, 2014

Movie Ad of the Week: UP YOUR TEDDY BEAR (1970)



Don Joslyn's oddball sex satire about the children's toy industry stars two former BATMAN villains (Julie "Catwoman" Newmar and Victor "King Tut" Buono) and the voice of Underdog (Wally Cox). Filmed as THE TOY GRABBERS, it was first released as the R-rated UP YOUR TEDDY BEAR by Geneni Film Distributing in 1970. The ad above is from Port Arthur, TX (July 22, 1970).


In 1971, a re-edited print was submitted to the MPAA under the title THE TOY GRABBERS and received a PG. After more re-editing, it went back to the MPAA and reverted to an R for Ellman Enterprises' release as MOTHER. The above ad is from Danville, VA (November 22, 1972).


MOTHER became HOT MOTHER in 1973. Above is the ad for its Lawton, OK showing at the Video Twin Theatre (January 27, 1974).


Six years later and still hot! Chicago opening: September 26, 1980.


Something Weird's print -- which carries the Geneni logo and the onscreen title UP YOUR TEDDY BEAR -- runs 82 minutes, 27 seconds.


In 2005, Troma released a "digitally remastered, lovingly created director's cut DVD" under the title THE SEDUCTION OF A NERD. This version runs 76 minutes.

Sunday, January 26, 2014

Movie Ad of the Week: FLATFOOT (1975)


The first of four Italian crime comedies starring Bud Spencer as Inspector “Flatfoot” Rizzo, PIEDONE LO SBIRRO (1973) was released in the U.S. under three different titles by a small distributor (S.J. International) hoping to capitalize on Spencer’s stateside success in THEY CALL ME TRINITY and TRINITY IS STILL MY NAME. Three sequels followed -- FLATFOOT IN HONG KONG (1975), FLATFOOT IN AFRICA (1978), and FLATFOOT ON THE NILE (1980) -- none of which received much, if any, exposure in the U.S.

FLATFOOT
Kansas City, KS
April 18, 1975


THE MARSEILLES CONNECTION
Thomasville, GA
July 20, 1975


A FISTFUL OF HELL
Cedar Rapids, IA
December 12, 1975

Sunday, January 19, 2014

Movie Ad of the Week: Fabian and Peter Lorre in New Rochelle (August 1962)



Peter Lorre and Fabian appeared onstage at the RKO Proctor's theater in New Rochelle on August 27, 1962 to promote FIVE WEEKS IN A BALLOON, an Irwin Allen production in CinemaScope based loosely on Jules Verne's novel. The two were introduced by legendary WINS-AM disc jockey Murray "the K" Kaufman. The other half of that afternoon's Barbara Eden double feature was SWINGIN' ALONG (1961), a Tommy Noonan-Peter Marshall comedy also released as DOUBLE TROUBLE.

Sunday, January 12, 2014

Movie Ad of the Week: WHOSE CHILD AM I? (1977)



The British fertility clinic exploitation pic WHOSE CHILD AM I? -- shot in 1974 as WHO'S HARRIET? and starring Kate O'Mara (THE VAMPIRE LOVERS, THE HORROR OF FRANKENSTEIN) -- was submitted to the MPAA in February 1975 and began a regional roll-out from Brian Distribution later that year. With newspaper ads that made it look like a horror film, and co-billed with a real horror film (THE DEVIL'S WEDDING NIGHT), it opened at the Marbro Drive-In in Kingsport, TN on September 29, 1977.


Over a year later -- and no longer aimed at the horror crowd -- it opened in the New York City area on a double bill with EMBRYO on December 15, 1978.

Sunday, January 05, 2014

Movie Ad of the Week: MAGICAL MYSTERY TOUR in Atlanta (1974)



This nearly four-hour long program of Beatles and Rolling Stones short subjects opened in three theaters in Atlanta on December 20, 1974. MAGICAL MYSTERY TOUR (1967) was made for British television and aired on BBC1 on December 26, 1967. It didn't reach U.S. shores until seven years later, when Carson Entertainment Group released the 55-minute film to theaters on combo programs such as this one (Despite what is written on Wikipedia and the IMDb, New Line Cinema didn't distribute MAGICAL MYSTERY TOUR until the late '70s). THE BEATLES AT SHEA STADIUM (1966) runs 48 minutes long and is a film of the fab four's concert at Shea Stadium on August 15, 1965. THE ROLLING STONES AT HYDE PARK (1969), a.k.a. THE STONES IN THE PARK, is a 53-minute long documentation of the Rolling Stones' July 5, 1969 concert in Hyde Park, two days after the death of guitarist and founding member Brian Jones. CHARLIE, MY DARLING! (1966) runs 60 minutes and covers the Stones' 1965 tour of Ireland (An alternate cut, titled CHARLIE IS MY DARLING, was released on DVD in 2012).

Sunday, December 29, 2013

Movie Ad of the Week: THE HALLUCINATORS (1971)



William Grefé's THE NAKED ZOO (1970) -- filmed under the title THE GROVE and starring Rita Hayworth, Stephen Oliver, and Fay Spain -- opened in Lima, OH on May 12, 1971 as THE HALLUCINATORS. The tag line "See it the way it isn't" seems especially fitting since this is the Barry Mahon revision of Grefé's film, featuring nudie footage and an appearance by blues rockers Canned Heat. Both versions will be issued on a DVD/Blu-ray combo in 2014 by Vinegar Syndrome.

Sunday, December 22, 2013

Movie Ad of the Week: GRASSLAND / HEX (1973)


GRASSLAND (1973), a.k.a. HEX, is a supernatural biker-horror movie set in Nebraska in 1919, starring Keith Carradine, Scott Glenn, Hilary Thompson, Cristina Raines, Gary Busey, Robert Walker, Jr. and Dan Haggerty. Directed and co-written by Leo Garen, from a story by Dorian William Cannon and Vernon Zimmerman, GRASSLAND was shot in 1971 and barely released under two different titles by a thoroughly confused 20th Century Fox in 1973. Prism Entertainment released it on VHS as THE SHRIEKING in 1991, and 15 years later it resurfaced on DVD as CHARMS.


GRASSLAND
September 26, 1973
Madison, WI


HEX
December 19, 1973
Ames, IA


THE SHRIEKING
Home video release - 1991


CHARMS
DVD release- 2006

Monday, December 09, 2013

Mystery Movie: KUNG FU KIDS (ca. 1973)



Big thanks to Fred Adelman of Critical Condition for bringing this one to our attention: a Taiwanese (?) fantasy film released in the U.S. as a kiddie matinee during the height of the '70s kung fu craze. The ad mat above and the one-sheet below are all we have to go on. Killer bats, giant cats, man-eating plants, a two-headed dragon... With all that goodness packed into one movie, it's incredible that KUNG FU KIDS has flown below the radar for so long. Anyone know what this is, and where the heck we can find a copy?


UPDATE: We found out recently that KUNG FU KIDS was distributed by Aquarius Releasing, and also played kiddie matinees as SUPERBOY AND SUPERGIRL AGAINST THE 7 MONSTERS. The ad below is from a booking in Westfield, NJ during the weekend of October 19-21, 1973.






Sunday, December 08, 2013

Movie Ad of the Week: MASTER OF HORROR w/ MASTER OF TERROR (1966)



Presented by Jack H. Harris and released by Joe Solomon's U.S. Films, these "two chillers to turn your dreams into screams" arrived in Houston, TX on March 3, 1966. MASTER OF HORROR is the truncated U.S. version of OBRAS MAESTRAS DEL TERROR (1960), an Argentinian film consisting of adaptations of two Edgar Allan Poe tales, "The Facts in the Case of M. Valdemar" and "The Cask of Amontillado." A third story, "The Tell-Tale Heart," was cut from this version, but later turned up in LEGEND OF HORROR (1972). The co-feature, MASTER OF TERROR, is a reissue of the Jack H. Harris production 4D MAN (1959), originally released by Universal and starring Robert Lansing, Lee Meriwether, James Congdon, Robert Strauss and Patti Duke.

Monday, December 02, 2013

TARGET SMUT: In Search of a Lost Anti-Porn Classic



Target Smut:
In Search of a Lost Anti-Porn Classic

by
Whitney Strub

TARGET SMUT may have had more direct impact than any anti-porn film in history — admittedly, not a momentous claim when one considers the rather inglorious canon that would include such entries as the feminist polemic NOT A LOVE STORY or this year's DON JON — yet it remains one of the most obscure. Produced by Citizens for Decent Literature in 1968 to attack the Supreme Court, it served its purpose with gusto, then disappeared immediately, still a lost work today.


Citizens for Decent Literature (CDL) was the preeminent anti-smut organization of the 1960s, nestled snugly between earlier Catholic pressure groups and later Christian Right ones. Less widely acknowledged, it was also without question the dominant producer and distributor of anti-porn films in that era, one of which, PERVERSION FOR PROFIT, might be the most famous title in the genre.


Founded by Cincinnati lawyer Charles Keating in the late 1950s, CDL amassed a rapid national following and exerted a powerful influence by the late Sixties, reaching its peak when President Richard Nixon appointed Keating to the President’s Commission on Obscenity and Pornography. Later Keating let CDL languish as he shifted his interests toward junk bonds in the 1980s, contributing to our current era of disaster capitalism during the Savings & Loan catastrophes of the Reagan era. Apparently sexual decency meant more to him than the financial sort.


I spent a good portion of my twenties obsessively pursuing CDL through archives across America. From right-wing literature collections in Los Angeles and Kansas, to fragmentary records from local chapters in Arizona and Pennsylvania, to the Lyndon Johnson Presidential Library and Museum in Austin, I chased every lead I could identify. It was the nerd version of detective work, and ultimately, I titled my first book, Perversion for Profit: The Politics of Pornography and the Rise of the New Right, after CDL’s film.


The group occupies a central role in my narrative of modern conservatism, and in my favorite chapter I show how they successfully modernized pro-censorship positions for an American public that didn’t want to see itself as Victorian or prudish — but also disliked the increasingly graphic sexual content of books, films, and magazines from the late Fifties onward.


As hard as I tried to look under every stone and follow the scattered CDL paper trail to its bitter end, you always miss something. Just this summer, digging through a collection at the National Archives in Washington, DC, I stumbled upon a file that seemed slightly out of place. The collection I was investigating was the records of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee to Investigate Juvenile Delinquency, mostly dated 1953-61 — but inside was a folder from 1968, with a transcript for TARGET SMUT.


With this, we can partially reconstruct TARGET SMUT — though some background might help.

As Keating built CDL into an empire, he smartly recognized the importance of controlling cultural narratives. It was the age of Marshall McLuhan, and not just lefties like Castro and Godard were thinking critically about the powers of the mass media. From early on, CDL turned not just toward repressing sexual expression, but also toward producing it, in the form of a series of short anti-porn films that tended to wallow in sensationalism.


PERVERSION FOR PROFIT is surely the most famous of CDL’s films, partly due to its internet ubiquity. We laugh today at its campy scare tactics, but the film was taken seriously in its day, paralleling the rhetoric coming from national authorities like J. Edgar Hoover. Serious debates were held over the film’s merits, as in this fascinating St. Louis episode:


Another early CDL film, PAGES OF DEATH, is lost, to the best of my knowledge. Jim Lindeman at Vintage Sleaze recently ran a great piece on it, and here’s an ad for what I believe was its world premiere, in Cincinnati, 1962:


A third CDL film, PRINTED POISON, popped up on the second disc of the HEAVY PETTING DVD several years ago; like PERVERSION, it wallows in the very muck it claims to fight, charting the course of a district attorney’s awakening to the need for smut-busting.


This trilogy constituted the core cinematic canon of CDL into the late 1960s, as seen in this mailing (archived at the University of Kansas’s Wilcox Collection in 1969, but circulating in the years beforehand):


Which takes us to TARGET SMUT. By 1968, the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren had spent a solid decade liberalizing obscenity law, until the boundaries of the legally acceptable had shifted from Lady Chatterley to “split-beaver” shorts and, soon, hardcore. Nothing better symbolized to CDL the moral rot at the heart of the so-called sexual revolution. Keating and CDL filed briefs in numerous Supreme Court obscenity cases, and they generally went disregarded, adding insult to perceived injury. So when President Lyndon Johnson nominated Abe Fortas to replace the retiring Earl Warren as Chief Justice, CDL geared up for revenge. Fortas, already a sitting justice on the High Court, was among its more liberal members, and for a growing portion of the conservative public, “liberal” meant “libertine.”


Conservative attacks on Fortas had begun immediately in early 1968, but gained little public traction. South Carolina senator Strom Thurmond, one of the reactionary leaders of the anti-Fortas cadre, vilified him constantly, on a variety of grounds: he had communist ties, he was soft on crime, the appointment was sheer LBJ cronyism (on this last point, he was correct). None of it seemed to stick — until Keating and CDL lawyer James Clancy offered a new line of attack: Fortas, who had once filed a brief on behalf of Playboy, was singlehandedly responsible for the porn-driven moral decline of America.

TARGET SMUT was apparently cobbled together as a visual indictment of Fortas and the Court. The filmstrip itself, unfortunately, has yet to surface, but the transcript at the National Archives survives; while it doesn’t provide a direct sense of the visuals, it offers strong hints. The narration details the legal history of obscenity, tracing it back to the 1688 English case of “rebel playwright” Sir Charles Sedley, who exposed himself on a balcony in the hopes of “bringing about a change in the social mores.” “Today,” it warns, “we have ‘rebels’ in the same and other professions, who entertain the same ideas.”

From there, things jump to the 1957 Supreme Court case Roth v. U.S., in which the Court established modern American obscenity doctrine. Linking Roth back to Sedley’s case is “our Judeo-Christian culture and the Common Law of our Anglo-Saxon heritage,” CDL explains. The research and facts are generally solid, but the ideological spin is heavy-handed; central to CDL’s legal argument is that power should reside with juries but has been usurped by appellate judges—an analysis that seems blithely oblivious to the entire course of American legal history since the Civil War. Because Justices Hugo Black and William O. Douglas refuse to recognize the validity of obscenity charges, TARGET SMUT contends, their votes should be “disqualified as not in consonance with the law”—a deliberate misunderstanding of the constitutional interpretation that is the High Court’s very function.

TARGET SMUT points to Abe Fortas as a significant part of the problem, and touts CDL’s own role in challenging such decadent judicial politics, recounting in heroic terms the 1966 Court term, in which “expectations were high,” as CDL counsel “climbed the 42 marble steps of the United States Supreme Court building.” Instead, a devastating setback occurred as the Court sat on over two dozen cases until 1967 before summarily reversing virtually every obscenity conviction that had reached it. “The root of this Nation’s problem,” the narrator argues, “is the United States Supreme Court and the extra-judicial judgments of some of its membership.”

Sprinkled throughout this dry legal discussion are plentiful descriptions of the texts at play in the cases, and it is near-certain that TARGET SMUT made ample visual use of them, much as the other CDL films had done. Images of the Court building and carefully chosen low-angle frown shots of Fortas or Douglas can only maintain viewer attention so long, after all; more captivating are such titles as Bondage Boarding School, Travelling Saleslady Gets Spanked, Lust Hungry, and Flesh Avenger. We are offered graphic descriptions of the textual and visual content of books and magazines. In one example, “The buttocks of many are elevated and thrust toward the camera, as if in invitation to sexual intercourse or sodomy. Lesbianism and group orgies are suggested by group shots of naked females in physical contact.” This was no doubt driven home by presenting the images in question to the audience — for purely legal inspection, of course.


In my favorite example, TARGET SMUT accuses Jack Smith’s queer underground film FLAMING CREATURES of depicting “masturbation of the male organ, and other sexual symbolisms.” While I think CDL might misunderstand the nature of symbolism (Smith’s film is nothing if not gloriously literal on the organs in question), I assume they included imagery from the film, in the process breaking inadvertent new ground for the conservative avant-garde.


TARGET SMUT concludes by channeling the poet Alexander Pope with the question, “Will our Nation embrace the monster vice?” Fortas, of course, is the monster, CDL the dragonslayer.

As propaganda, this is far from CDL’s finest moment; however stimulating and striking the images were, the narration is simply too legalistic, with few of the thundering exclamations of the earlier films. Still, as cobbled-together agitprop, it worked. Under CDL’s guidance, Strom Thurmond embraced the obscenity analysis and ran with it; by August, his earlier condemnations of Fortas had receded, as he struck the one new note over and over again. Here’s the lead to his newsletter, Strom Thurmond Reports to the People, from August 1968, to give a sense of his rhetoric:


The new line worked. Backstage realpolitik involving tensions within the Democratic Party had likely doomed Fortas from the start, but it was the CDL-provided language of obscenity that sealed the deal with the public. Thurmond screened TARGET SMUT, and also a short striptease film labeled O-7, for fellow members of Congress and journalists, until “Fortas” and “filth” became inseparable terms. When the Senate held hearings, Clancy was invited to testify, and obscenity dominated the discussion.

When I dug through Lyndon Johnson’s mail, it was striking to see the sudden impact: through the spring of 1968, few letters from the public, many in support of Fortas, then an eruption of indignation and opposition. The nomination collapsed, Fortas was soon driven off the Court when unrelated accounts of improper financial arrangement surfaced, and incoming President Richard Nixon managed four appointments, setting in motion a half-century of increasingly hardline conservatism at the marble palace.

CDL, of course, roundly applauded itself:


A grateful Nixon appointed Keating to the President’s Commission on Obscenity and Pornography to pull off the same trick—destabilizing it and undermining its 700-page social science report in 1970 that argued for the decriminalization of adult obscenity. Though the Commission presented a very compelling case, it was Keating’s outraged dissenting report that drew more attention—and was cited favorably by new, Nixon-appointed Chief Justice Warren Burger, despite its outlandish claims of otherwise healthy people corrupted by smut (I tell the whole sordid story of the commission and its fallout in Perversion for Profit).

So, TARGET SMUT may be the most tangibly influential anti-porn film in history—but where did it go? I’m not sure. CDL lawyer James Clancy left a disappointingly thin array of papers to the Library of Congress, and I found a 1991 letter tentatively suggesting a University of North Carolina grad student might have a copy—but that’s where the trail ends, at least thus far.

If where it went is unclear, why it vanished might be more explicable. In an ironic twist, CDL’s own lurid obsessions caught up with them in Minneapolis, after a set of 1968 screenings:


Nietzsche’s oft-quoted line about fighting monsters has long since entered the realm of cliché, but bears paraphrasing: whoever fights smut should see to it that in process he does not become a smutmonger. Of course, the fact that CDL tacitly embraced the contradictions of doing both was central to its success—and indicative of deep and persistent undercurrents in the history of American sexuality.

Whitney Strub is the author of Perversion for Profit: The Politics of Pornography and the Rise of the New Right, and Obscenity Rules: Roth v. United States and the Long Struggle over Sexual Expression. He blogs at strublog.wordpress.com.

Sunday, December 01, 2013

Movie Ad of the Week: MY SON THE VAMPIRE w/ MONSTROSITY (1963)



This offbeat horror double bill rolled into Lebanon, PA on December 20, 1963. MOTHER RILEY MEETS THE VAMPIRE (1952) was the last of 16 British comedies featuring Arthur Lucan as his popular drag character, elderly Mrs. Riley. Despite the presence of co-star Bela Lugosi as a vampire named Van Housen, it took another 10 years for this movie to reach the U.S. Under the title MY SON THE VAMPIRE (1963), it featured a new pre-credit sequence and song by Allan Sherman, whose comedy LP My Son, the Nut -- featuring the Grammy Award-winning single "Hello Muddah, Hello Faddah" -- had been at the top of the Billboard charts for two months prior to the film's release, and eventually sold over 1.2 million copies.

The co-feature is better known as THE ATOMIC BRAIN thanks to late-night TV showings (beginning in 1967) and Mystery Science Theatre 3000, although Something Weird Video did issue it on a triple feature DVD with LOVE AFTER DEATH (1968) and THE INCREDIBLE PETRIFIED WORLD (1957).